November 2005 Archives

My First Piece of Art!
By Trevor on November 30, 2005 5:31 PM | 2 Comments

When I moved here to San Francisco, I was lucky to run into a boy online named Louis who had just moved to the Bay Area from Atlanta. Well it turns out he's a fantastic abstract artist and, after seeing our bare walls at Chateau Hoppewood, offered to whip up a little something for my walls.

Well, that little something turned into an ambitious plan for a whopping 40 in. x 60 in. (or, 3 ft 4 in x 6 ft) abstract of the view of downtown San Francisco from Twin Peaks. Basically, amazing.

Today he delivered the painting and it's simply beautiful! I had to share it here with everyone. It's a bit too large to attempt to scale down to view in this lil' window on my site. Click on the thumbnail below and you'll get a bigger version!

RENT: The Movie
By Trevor on November 23, 2005 5:51 AM | No Comments

Those who know me, know that since the musical "RENT" hit Broadway I was a groveling fan. It spoke to me - as it did so many other queer people - in a way that no other popular medium had until that time. My parents got me tickets to see a traveling version of the play in 1999 in Charlotte, North Carolina. I was hooked.

When I was senior in High School, I organized a Broadway Revue with three songs featured from the musical: "Light My Candle," "Seasons of Love," and "Out Tonight." The event raised nearly $1000 for the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative. It was Fall 2001 - this was the closest I could come to doing LGBTQ activism in North Carolina.

It will come as no surprise, then, that when I learned this brilliant musical was going to become a feature film I was both excited and nervous. The fact that many of the original Broadway cast members were to be tapped for the cinematic endeavor was promising. The director, Chris Columbus, seemed unusual but not a sure sign of danger.

I got a chance to see a midnight showing of the film tonight at the Metreon here in San Francisco. What a thrill to be in a room with 1000 other hardcore Rent fans, I thought. San Francisco surely would be the 2nd best city in which see the film that first evening (NYC, obviously, being 1st). I showed up with my friend Jackson to find a room of 1000 teenagers who were barely alive when the musical debuted. I suppose everyone who was of the original "RENT" generation is now somewhere in their late 20s to mid 30s. They all have day jobs. As someone who came out full-force in 1997, I consider myself a (albeit young) member of that first generation.

I didn't let the crowd deride my enthusiasm for the event, however. The film, in a bold move, opens with the musicals most well-known number, "Seasons of Love." Each of the main characters stands on an otherwise empty stage in front of a deserted theatre. Despite a few bumps, though, the film starts off strong and delivers an experience that is poignant (if a bit melodramatic).

I was sold wholeheartedly until the movie veered dramatically off course with (SPOILER ALERT) the introduction of a completely inappropriate side-story. For the unaware, one of the major plot lines revolves around the relationship between Joanne, a straight-laced black lesbian lawyer, and Maureen, a flirtatious white performance artist who performs to promote issues related to homelessness in NYC.

Now, anyone who knows this musical will be appalled to hear what I am about to tell you. Maureen and Joanne, in the movie, get MARRIED. Well, okay, there was no gown or cake - but there was a get-down-on-my-knees "pop the question" moment that made my stomach churn. I grabbed Jackson's arm in disbelief and sat, aghast, at the unfolding events that included a fancy reception at a hotel. And, at that moment, I thought I heard the distant rattling of Jonathan Larson rolling over in his grave.

Now let me be clear: this musical is set in 1990. If we think back to 1990 and the state of the gay and lesbian political movement, it becomes striking just how unbelievable this would have been. This was a time when AIDS was still the lens through which most LGBTQ activism was done. Matthew Shepard had only just graduated from middle school. Marriage was NOT - I repeat, NOT on the table. It simply wasn't even conceivable to the vast majority of LGBTQ Americans. Director Christopher Columbus was playing on cultural capital of the present that he inappropriately projected into the past.

With that said, the rest of the film is stirring. There are few moments of contrived, awkward dialogue and cheesy shots of Roger in what looks to be the Grand Canyon ("finding himself," I presume). However, the zany energy of "La Vie Boheme" translated marvelously and the reprise of "I'll Cover You" was as moving as ever. This was truly Collins' (Jesse L. Martin) and Angel's (Wilson Heredia) film - they stole the show time and time again. Martin gives us an outstanding and heartfelt performance that brought laughter and, of course, those gut-wrenching tears with his mournful delivering of "I'll Cover You." Their words never felt static or forced, which can't be said for some of the other cast members.

Angel's painful death opened up the floodgates; a sniffling silence filled the otherwise rambunctious audience. I cried not just for Angel, but for all those young beautiful men who were taken from us. I cried reflecting upon what could have been -- the voices that were silenced. What books could have been written? What songs could have been sung? What fights could have been won? We will never know. "RENT" reminds us of this massive funeral that, for queer communities, was the 1980s and early 1990s. Our community was mercilessly robbed and, reflecting on that loss, it's clear that we still haven't recovered.

The Worst Speech of Bush's Presidency (Yet)
By Trevor on November 14, 2005 3:57 PM | No Comments

You thought it couldn't get worse, right? Common Dreams has a nice little article detailing why Bush's speech on Veteran's Day (in which he called Democrats "irresponsible" for criticizing the war) may be his worse speech yet. You can find it here. A nice little take-away moment:

Moreover, Veterans Day is certainly not the venue for a president to attack the opposition party or single out a defeated opponent, as Bush did today. Towards the end of his speech, Bush declared, "While it's perfectly legitimate to criticize my decision or the conduct of the war, it is deeply irresponsible to rewrite the history of how that war began." He criticized "some Democrats and antiwar critics" for "claiming we manipulated the intelligence and misled the American people about why we went to war." Then he did something that no president in recent memory has done: He took what could be read as an implicit shot at the man he defeated, explaining, "Many of these critics supported my opponent during the last election, who explained his position to support the resolution in Congress this way." Bush then quoted Kerry's statement defending his vote to authorize the use of force in Iraq -- essentially holding Kerry up for ridicule, since Kerry is now a war critic. Do you remember Clinton criticizing Bob Dole in 1997; or Reagan criticizing Walter Mondale in 1985; or even Nixon criticizing George McGovern in 1973? Of course not -- second-term presidents tend to co-opt, not condemn, defeated opponents.
Creating Change Conference '05
By Trevor on November 14, 2005 7:16 AM | No Comments

What a weekend! If you weren't aware, the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force's annual Creating Change Conference took place this year just across the bay in Oakland. I missed last year's event in St. Louis, but had previously been to the conferences in Miami (2003) and Portland (2002). (I worked for the NGLTF as their Creating Change Intern in Cambridge, Massachusetts in the summer of '03).

There are so many amazing things I could say about this year's event. Creating Change is composed of nearly 100 workshops that take place over a long weekend that kicks off Wednesday and ends Sunday. I attended workshops Thursday through Saturday. Each day, there is also a plenary session (where all of the nearly 3000 conference attendees come together to hear the same speaker(s)). Saturday I had the pleasure of attending the premier plenary featuring former Task Force ED Urvashi Vaid and the famed gay historian John D'Emilio. Vaid has long been one of the most inspirational figures in my life as an LGBT activist. She keynoted the first conference I organized at UNC in April 2003. Hopefully the Task Force will post the text of their speech and I'll put a link up if that happens.

I went to seven amazing workshops. It would take much too long to attempt to describe them all, but here they are by title:

1. Deterioration of Privacy Laws and the Effects on Transgender People (including none other than Dean Space of the Sylvia Rivera Law Project)

2. Sex, Race, Class and Gender: Establishing All-Inclusive, Sex-Positive Public Policy

3. Gay Men and Crystal: Probing the Root Causes (in which one important point from the facilitator Eric Rofes was that we talk so much about crystal meth but not about, say, crack - a drug done by heavily by poor people of color. We also heard from Tony Valenzuela who recently wrote a beautiful piece for LA Weekly on Crystal and gay men)

4. Radical Feminism: Still Sexy, Still Tool for Change

5. Defunding Our Lives: The LGBT Community and the Privatization of Social Security and the Federal Tax Cuts (a *fantastic* workshop)

6. From Gay Marriage to Queer Gentrification - Radical Queers Critique the Mainstreaming of the Gay Movement (Evan Wolfson, ED of Freedom to Marry, was about to rip his arm off next to us in this workshop haha - they put this workshop in a room that could hold maybe 50 people. About 300 or so showed up - we had to be moved!)

7. Legislative and Legal Battles for Transgender Equality

All in all, the workshops were fantastic. I felt like I saw an increase this year in targeted educational workshops that focused on specific issues of economic and racial justice for LGBTQ people (specifically, the workshops on Social Security and the one on Privacy Laws). It was, for instance, extremely useful to hear an in-depth analysis of what privatization of Social Security looks like (for everyone) and how that specifically threatens queer people, especially those of us who are working class and/or people of color. These are the kinds of trainings that one simply doesn't have access to anywhere else but spaces like Creating Change.

After the three days of intense workshopping was over, I was lucky enough to be invited to a soiree at Eric Rofes' house where I got a chance to speak with Suzanne Pharr (who keynoted my third and final Unity Conference at UNC), Urvashi Vaid, and Amber Hollibaugh (long-time economic justice activist within the LGBTQ movement).

It was, without a doubt, a needed jolt to my activist spirit. My graduate program has unfortunately not been providing me space to think about the kinds of issues the Creating Change brought to the table. I've been feeling starved of critical analysis - feeling as though my skills for analysis were actually starting to evaporate. That's a whole other blog entry, though.

New LAMBDA Article
By Trevor on November 9, 2005 4:46 AM | No Comments

I already posted a version of this article on here, but I thought I'd send a link to the LAMBDA site to show off its beautiful new layout. You can access it here. It's about my initial experiences in graduate school for the audience of undergraduates at UNC.

Senator Lott Calls ReThugs on Their Shit
By Trevor on November 8, 2005 4:51 PM | No Comments

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist and Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert fired off a letter to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees demanding an investigation into the "leak" of classified information regarding the CIA's holding of prisoners in secret prisons overseas.

Frist and Hastert made a big show and whined that this leak could damage national security. What they apparently didn't expect was Republican Senator Trent Lott to call them on their bluff: the leak came from within the Republican Party (thanks to DailyKos for this). From the Kos:

Lott just said, Tuesday afternoon, that he thinks it was a GOP Senator who leaked the info to the Washington Post last week. He says the details had been discussed at a GOP Senators-only meeting last week, and that many of those details made it into the WaPo story.

Money quote from Lott; "We can not remain silent. We have met the enemy, and it is us."

All just reported on CNN. We are, folks, witnessing the full-on implosion of the national Republican Party. And not a second too soon.

Bush's Approval Ratings Take Another Dive: 35%
By Trevor on November 3, 2005 2:09 AM | No Comments

From CBS News (Thanks to DailyKos for the link):

Bush's low job approval is far below that of some of his two-term predecessors at this point in their second terms. In November 1985, President Reagan had a 65 percent approval rating, and Bill Clinton's job approval in November 1997 was 57 percent. Bush's rating is higher than Richard Nixon's was at the same point in his administration.

BUSH VS. OTHER PRESIDENTS: APPROVAL RATINGS DURING SECOND TERMS

Bush, Now
Approve 35%
Disapprove 57%

Clinton, 11/1997
Approve 57%
Disapprove 31%

Reagan, 11/1985
Approve 65%
Disapprove 26%

Nixon, Gallup Poll, 11/1973
Approve 27%
Disapprove 63%

Eisenhower, Gallup Poll, 11/1957
Approve 58%
Disapprove 27%

Nomination Nutbag
By Trevor on November 1, 2005 5:30 AM | No Comments

With the Miers nomination shot down by his own party, President Bush capitulated today (a nod to Halloween, undoutedly) to his hardline ultra-right base by nominating Justice Alito (whom the left's blogosphere is fondly callign "Scalito").

Just how crazy is this nutty Rethuglican? Well - let's see. He seems convinced that wives are the property of their husbands, a nod to Victorian times. In his most publicized decision (the Federal Circuit precursor to the SCOTUS decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey), he was the lone dissentor to a court that decided to strike down a Pennsylvania law that would require married women to notify their husbands before having an abortion. In another less publicized decision (Doe v. Groody), he sided with police in a case involving the strip-searching of a women and her 10 year old daughter when the police warrant only named the woman's husband.

What else? Well, he attempted to strike down the Family and Medical Leave Act - which gives parents the right to 12 weeks of unpaid leave after the birth of their child. The Supreme Court overruled that decision. He supports race-based discrimination, discrimination based on disability, oh, and of course he supports the right of students to harrass other students based on sexual orientation (notice its one of the few moments he supports anybody's "right" to anything).

Bush declared war on Social Justice as soon as he took office, and this nomination is the crux of that war. Were Alito to be confirmed, he would replace O'Conner's moderate swing vote on the Supreme Court with a hardline conservative vote. Were he confirmed, we could expect that nearly every major initiative aimed at social justice built over the past 40 years will come tumbling down. But this won't happen. Why, you ask? Because Bush is knee-deep in post-Katrina / CIA Leak hell and the GOP is between a rock and a hard place. The American public is tired of the fire-and-brimstone lies that keeps spewing forth from the right - they're ready to hear the Left's voice! Be heard! Talk about Alito and what his nomination means to you and your core values. Call your Senator. Make Bush the lame duck that he deserves to be.