Subscribe to TrevorHoppe.com





Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License


August 10, 2009

Men Who Bareback Should Be Made Partners in Health Promotion, Not Banished
FILED UNDER: "Gay Men's Health & Culture"
TAGS: barebackgay men's healthHIV / AIDSIMLInternational Mr. Leatherpublic healthTony Valenzuela
By Tony Valenzuela

[ Image redacted -- see here ]

(This image illustrates some of the backlash towards IML's new policy. Far as I know, only bareback porn is banned from IML's leather marketplace)

The tone of the online debate has been, well, impolite following the announcement by International Mr. Leather to ban the promotion and distribution of bareback porn at the weekend event's leather marketplace.

"Fascists. No wonder they like uniforms," wrote a man identified as Liam Cole reacting to the ban on Treasure Island Media's blog "You're just a bunch of sick people who need help," countered an anonymous poster on the same blog.

On August 17th at 6 pm at the Center on Halsted in Chicago, I will be sitting on a panel called "Risky Business? Reclaiming Pleasure," to discuss what effect bareback porn has on men's desires, fantasies and behaviors. The forum is not about IML's ban but will throw a wider net on the discussion of porn, sex without condoms and desire.

As a guest on Trevor's blog, I'd like to focus here on the IML ban that, once again, brought into focus the raw feelings that surface when gay men talk about raw sex. I should state my opinion up front: I disagree with IML's decision, don't believe it will affect behavior, and fear it will further marginalize a group of high risk men who need to be brought under the tent of community wellness, not banished.

"I never thought I'd see the day that IML is used as a vehicle for censorship," said one anonymous source at the Chicago Free Press website. "I don't like being treated like a child at an adult event." Disputing this charge was Colin at Gay Men's Social Crisis blog (GMSC) who said, "I have a hard time with this [censorship] argument. I find bareback porn in direct conflict with health education, even if it does present what can and should be recognized as a fantasy scenario."

Maybe the better question isn't whether or not IML's new policy is censorship - it is by definition - but whether censoring bareback porn from the IML marketplace, however offensively this may strike some of us, is worth the presumed outcome of "social responsibility" and health?

This is where the ban on bareback porn starts to appear arbitrary. On GMSC Colin observed, "I do love how bareback media is banned, and yet Mr. Renslow has made no mention of the bestiality porn that was quite prevalently displayed this year." Porn fetishizing shit was also available in the marketplace, according to online commentators who attended this year. If sexual ethics and health are what's at stake, then why ban barebacking but not bestiality or scat? At The Moby Files a man identified as J.P. added, "Perhaps IML should stop courting the alcohol company sponsorships and ad revenue if they were truly serious about setting a tone of responsibility for the community."

These arguments about the "gateways" to HIV infection (be they substances or images) are, it should be noted, of the same class of argument used largely by evangelical Christians and Republicans in their attempts to criminalize pornography, to censor sex and violence from TV and video games, and to shut down commercial adult establishments such as strip clubs and bathhouses. The business of protecting you from your untrustworthy self has historically been the province of the right wing.

Is viewing bareback porn a greater risk for HIV transmission than attending establishments and events (such as sex clubs or IML) where it is readily available? That's unlikely. There's a better chance of getting drunk by going to a bar than by watching National Lampoon's Animal House. But aren't these the wrong questions to be asking when we're talking about the purview of consenting adults? Deciding what is "advocating" versus "personal choice" at an event that celebrates sexual fetish is an exercise in tortured logic. Leave it to consenting adults to decide, no?

Interestingly, the question of whether or not we're even talking about adults is a major point of contention. "Imagine being a 23 year old kid and walking into that scene," said a man identified as Keith on Manhunt's blog. "You are being told that bareback is hot, bareback is masculine and bareback is acceptable. Is that the message we want to send?"

Chuck Renslow repeated this sentiment when he told me in an interview that a primary reason for IML's bareback porn ban was to protect leather newbies who might be uninformed about the continued dangers of HIV and misconstrue the display and sale of bareback porn at the marketplace as a sign that safer sex is no longer necessary. "If I can prevent even one HIV infection," he said.

To this, Paul Morris of Treasure Island Media e-mailed me: "Well, how will he keep the uninformed from walking around the hotel, where raw fucking and drug use are everywhere? The goings-on in the hotel exceed the imaginings of the sleaziest bareback porn producer (which would be me). So if he's serious about saving the innocent young'uns, Chuck would have to shut the whole operation down."

The "protect the youth" argument is a strange one to be having about an indisputably adult event and ironic considering this is the argument used repeatedly to whip up fear against LGBT people in our battles for civil rights. The right wing is, at least, actually talking about youth when, in an anti-gay marriage commercial, it casts an 8 year old girl telling her mommy she learned in school she can one day grow up to marry a princess. At the IML marketplace, not even 18 year olds can enter: 21 is the age limit.

Treating twentysomethings like children does not support them, it alienates them. Twentysomethings, like the rest of us, do not want decisions made for them. And like the rest of us, when it comes to health what they want is reliable information and the freedom to use that information by their own free will, even if we disagree with their choices. This has not changed since I was a twentysomething in the mid-90's and older activists at the time claimed the reason my generation was taking risks was because we didn't see all our friends die, the same reason given now about the latest batch of twentysomethings. If seeing our friends die is the only barometer by which you believe health promotion can be effective, you need to quietly retire yourself from this conversation.

The top reason cited for IML's bareback porn ban, stated in the letter sent to vendors, is that the CDC and local health officials informed Mr. Renslow that new HIV infections are on the rise. In graduate school I put together a list of newspaper headlines from the early 90's through the present (then 2004) that announced "alarming increases" in HIV infections among gay men. Every year, several times a year, the same headline. We should have all been infected by now.

This has never been new information. There are always populations of gay/bi men somewhere in the U.S. where infections go up (like young gay/bi African American men in Baltimore), while they go down in others (like older gay white men in San Francisco). HIV statistics are cited so frequently and confusingly and have been used so often to manipulate our fear and guilt that many gay men hear them like Bush era terror alerts.

I am not saying this to diminish the genuine concern of new infections. The best research I've read does indeed point to increases in infection rates especially among young gay men of color. What I question is the wisdom of banning, marginalizing and demonizing that our community practices when public health issues its press releases.

This, to me, is the saddest aspect of IML's decision to ban bareback porn, a decision that followed similar bans at Folsom, Dorey Alley and likely other venues I've not heard about. We know bans don't affect behavior but we ban anyway, perpetuating secrecy, lying and shame among gay men.

"What about our porn?" an HIV positive friend of mine said the other day when we were discussing IML's new policy. He was acknowledging the fact that bareback porn is largely (though not entirely) porn made by HIV positive men. Is it responsible to censor the sexuality of poz men in the interest of HIV negative men? Not if you respect HIV positive men, it's not.

I don't doubt that Chuck Renslow is "my people." He's a legend in the leather community, has owned bathhouses, sex clubs, fetish bars and has spent the majority of his life as an unabashed defender of the sexual subcultures that many gay men identify with more strongly than the mainstream LGBT movements that keep them at arms length. What I'm afraid Mr. Renslow doesn't realize is that his people have evolved, and that sophisticated understandings of safer sex without condoms (i.e. serosorting, strategic positioning) are widely practiced by gay men everywhere, and especially by those who attend IML.

Perhaps it's time that the leather community incorporate men who bareback into its credo of "safe, sane and consensual." Without these men as partners in health promotion, one of the community's most marginalized populations becomes disenfranchised from wellness altogether. This is neither safe nor sane.

PERMALINK | Posted at 4:18 PM | Post a Comment (7)

7 Comments

Tony I'm so honored to have this fabulous piece here on my little blog! Very smart analysis here. I hope the message travels far and wide! xoxo

Author Profile Page Trevor User Profile | August 10, 2009 5:05 PM

Tony, thank you very much for sharing your insight. I posted two articles on our site, one in 2008 after hearing Mr. Renslow's address at IML that year, and the other following his letter this year. They were titled "Marginalized in Our Own Community" and "Marginalized Again", respectively, so I particularly appreciated your use of the same term in your post. There are many sides to this discussion and it needs to be viewed from multiple angles. I appreciate your ability to articulate a viewpoint that may not be the mainstream or popular one.

Author Profile Page FlipFlop User Profile | August 10, 2009 6:29 PM

Tony---as ever you are challenging, insightful and inspiring....and modeling the very kind of work that the "field" of queer health should be doing: work that embraces and partners with all members of its community rather than creating further destructive striations that stigmatize...further eroding our sense of community and undermining our ability to keep ourselves and our community healthy---in ALL senses of the word....not just those that have been so narrowly defined and imposed upon us.

Author Profile Page Erik L. User Profile | August 10, 2009 6:38 PM

Thanks for this article, when I first heard about the ban, my first instinct was to think good for him! Later though I had to rethink that. I work a lot in the community and can often be found out at the bars handing out condoms etc. The thing I learned pretty quick was that there were three major groups. First--the group that would take as many condoms you could give. Second--those that would refuse, for whatever reason. And third-- those that would take the condoms, almost out of peer pressure or for appearance, after which you can find them either littered on the floor or opened up and stuck over a beer bottle.

The point being nowadays I TRY to only target group one, there isn't any point in going for the other two groups. We have to find something else to help them out, education, or something more inventive yet to be determined...or perhaps they are already well educated and don't need a darn thing?

Who knows, I think it is the same thing for the Bareback porn issue. While I can respect his decision for banning bareback porn, I think it has an increased potential for backfiring on us. Those who want help will often come to you. Those that don't need another kind of education, I think that the only way to help these days after what I guess is a "failure of condoms" of a sort, is to lay off on our pushing of condoms as the only option. That isn't working. As angry as some may be about that, there are other--perhaps not effective in the same way--but effective nonetheless--ways of helping. Denying barebacking is going on and pushing it into the darkness isn't going to help, denial tends to breed a whole other problem.

Author Profile Page Kris User Profile | August 10, 2009 8:04 PM

A fantastic read! Really informative, you brought up a lot of things that I had never thought about before. You're right if bans do not work, it doesn't make sense to put them in place. It's like a reflex in human behavior to assume banning something inevitably leads to "fixing" the problem, when everything points to the contrary.

Author Profile Page clarence.flanders User Profile | August 10, 2009 10:26 PM

HIV/AIDS preventing and gay sexual practices (barebaking) are an excessively complex issue and people are frustrated that we seem to not be making progress on as a community but from some perspectives backsliding.

The reaction to ban bareback porn is a human one to look for simple solutions to complex problems, we all fall prey to it at times. That said I doubt the idea even occured to Chuck until after he gave his impassioned speach about AIDS prevention at IML and people started calling him a hypocrite.

Banning it may not have a preventive effect on people's behavior but that doesn't mean it's wrong. And yes on some level it's censorship, but give you can walk two blocks from the hotel and buy the stuff or order online it's so pervasive, it's more akin to deciding your particular venue is smoke free. (and yes I know that analogy has it's weakness as well.)

That said a LOT of risky behavior goes on in the gay community and I'm mildly curious how to estimate the amount of at IML but I've not found any reasonable way to do so. It might be useful to come up with a valid discussion or measurement of how much of this goes on to put things in perspective. That said even a gross approximation isn't going to yield useful information to questions like how many people seroconvert at IML.

I don't know what or how to go about educating or dealing with the problem but I do think people have to acknowledge it is a problem and do something. I also fear that doing things (like banning bareback) will ultimate kill the event or lead into being something so different that it might as well be.

Annecodatally I was surprised to discover (many years ago) that it seems there's less transmission within the hardcore kinky community. I thought this was due to people being more knowledable and more capable of doing other "safer" activities. Since then I've come to believe it's just because a large % of them already seroconverted before becoming memberes of the community. It's a topic that's difficult to analyze.

Author Profile Page a2andy User Profile | August 21, 2009 1:45 AM

For the sake of balance, I'd like to point out that the issue, and the debate, is much larger than that of bareback and it is not about bareback being dangerous or irresponsible or that it should be banned and it is certainly not about “The business of protecting you from your untrustworthy self has historically been the province of the right wing.” (Valenzuela, ibid.) The left wing control freak nanny state is not any better. The real debate is about an individual decision to favour personal freedom and right to satisfy one’s own pleasure or of a collective public health response to an epidemic that concerns all of us.

Author Profile Page peripheries User Profile | August 27, 2009 5:10 PM


About Us
Trevorade is a community of people just like you who spend their days thinking about sex, gay men's health, and HIV/AIDS. Welcome!

We Need Your Support
We're supported almost exclusively by donations from generous souls like yourself. So please, if you enjoy the content here, shell out a few gay dollars to help us cover our hosting bills.










Clips N' Chips
Liberal-Minded. Antillean-American. Queer. Non-PC Feminist.
Joe. My. God.
Gay Culture, Short Stories, & More! NY-Based.
Kaleidoscope
 Fellow Ann Arborite and Gay Blogger. Sexuality & Human Rights focus.
Knucklecrack
Gay Activist Eric Levin's Fabulous NY-Based Blog.
Lifelube
Gay, Sexy, Healthy - Just Like You!
Pam's House Blend
She's a fabulous North Carolinian blogging about politics, LGBT and women's rights, the influence of the far Right, and race relations. What more can I say?


19th Century
ABC
abortion
abstinence
academia
Acapulco
ACLU
ACT UP
activism
Adam Lambert
Adam4Adam
Adrienne Rich
advertising
aesthetics
Africa
age of consent
AIDS in Culture
AIDS Inc
airlines
Alan Cumming
Alice Newton
Alix Olsen
Allan Berube
Amanda Blank
Amazon.com
Amber Hollibaugh
America's Next Top Model
American Idol
American Sexuality Magazine
Americans
anal queefing
anal sex
Ancient History
Anderson Cooper
Andre Cavalcante
Andrew Sullivan
Ann Arbor
Antiretrovirals
Apple
archival research
Argentina
Armed Forces
Art
art fair
astrology
atlanta
Australia
AutBar
bacon
Badlands
banned
bareback
barebacking
Barry Adams
bathhouse
Batman
Bay Area Reporter
BBC
Bea Arthur
bears
Berkeley
Bette Midler
Better World Advertising
Betty White
Beyonce
Beyond Masculinity
bi-curious
bigotry
bikes accidents
Bill Clinton
Bill Frist
Black gay men
Blackness
blogging
blow job
body image
Boston
Bottom identity
bougie white people
Brazil
Brent Corrigan
Britney Spears
Broadway
Brokeback Mountain
Bruce LaBruce
bullying
Bush Administration
Butt Magazine
California
call for papers
Calpernia Addams
Cameron Diaz
Camille Paglia
camp
campaign financing
Canada
cancer
capital punishment
capitalism
Carribean
Castro
Catholic Church
Cathy Cohen
Cazwell
CDC
Celine Dion
censorship
charity
Charlize Theron
Charlotte
Che Guevara
Cher
Chicago
China
chlamydia
Chris Bartlett
Christina Aguilera
Christina Applegate
Christopher Columbus
Chronicle of Higher Education
CIA
circuit boys
circumcision
civil rights
class politics
clubbing
CNN
cocaine
coming out
commodification
community
Community HIV/AIDS Mobilization Project
condoms
Congress
Connecticut
conservatives
cooking
copyright laws
Cornell
corporate welfare
corruption
Cortland Review
counterpublic health
country music
Craigslist
Creating Change
criminal justice
cruise ship
crystal methamphetamine
CTOPS
Cuba
cultural studies
D&X Abortions
daddies
Daily Beast
DailyKos
Dan Savage
Daniel Reeders
Danny DeVito
David Halperin
David Kaufman
David Letterman
David Malebranche
democrats
Denmark
Desperate Housewives
Destiny's Child
Detroit
Deutsche AIDS-Hilfe
Dick Cheney
dieting
disclosure
disco
discrimination
disidentification
Disney
divas
DOMA
douche bags
douching
drag queens
drugs
DSM
eagle
Ebay
Economics
economy
Edmund White
elderly
elections
Elizabeth Pisani
Ellen DeGeneres
England
epidemiology
epistemology
Eric Leven
Eric Rofes
español
Ethan Suniewick
Ethel Merman
ethics
ethnocentrism
European Union
Eurovision
Evan Wolfson
exams
Facebook
facial
family
Family Guy
fascism
Fashion
Father's Day
fausto fernos
FDA
feastoffun
FEMA
femininity
feminism
Feminist men
Ferndale
Film studies
Fiona Apple
fiscal responsibility
fisting
fitness
Florida
flow
foreclosure
FOX News
Frameline
France
free speech
Frontiers
FTM
Ganymede
Gary Dowsett
gas prices
gay bashing
Gay bitch
Gay City
gay gene
Gay icons
gay male culture
gay marriage
gay men
gay men's health
Gay Men's Health Leadership Academy
Gay Men's Health Summit
Gay Pride
gay sex
gay stuff
Gay.com
gayborhood
Gayle Rubin
geisha
gender identity
genderfuck
genetics
George W Bush
Germany
Gilbert Herdt
Giovanni's Room
GLAAD
GLBT Historical Society
GLBTSA
GLEE
Glenn Beck
GLF
global health
Gold Coast
Golden Girls
Golden Globes
goldstar
Google
graduate school
Grindr
Guillermo del Toro
H1N1
Haiti
hanky code
Harlequin Superromance
harm reduction
Harry Potter
Harvard
Harvey Milk
hate crimes
HBO
health care
Heather Cassils
Helen Goddard
herpes
heteronormativity
heterosexism
high school
higher education
Hillary Clinton
hipsters
HIV
HIV / AIDS
HIV Panic
HIV Prevention
HIV testing
HIV-positive
Hollywood
homofobia
homophobia
Homophobia
hooking up online
hospitals
HPPC
HPV
Human Rights Campaign
Hurricane Katrina
identity politics
Illinois
IML
immigration
India
individualism
Indonesia
inequality
Inga Muscio
insomnia
Institutional Review Board
insurance companies
intergenerational intimacy
International Mr. Leather
Internet
intersex
Iowa
iPhone
Iran
Iraq
Islam
Israel
iTunes
Ivy League
Jackson Bowman
James Baldwin
James Schuyler
Janet Jackson
Japan
Jean Genet
Jim Pickett
Joe Lieberman
John D'Emilio
John McCain
Jon Stewart
journalism
Juanita More
Judith Butler
Julia Serano
juventud
Juventud
k.d. lang
Kane Race
Kansas
Kansas City
Kanye West
Karl Rove
katastrophe
Kathy Griffin
keith green
Kevin Jennings
Kim & Cookie
kitsch
Kylie Minogue
LA Gay & Lesbian Center
Lady Gaga
LAMBDA
Lambda Literary Foundation
lark ballinger
Larry Kramer
Las Vegas
latino
Lauryn Hill
lawyers
leadership
leather
Legends
Les Natali
lesbians
LGBT Cinema
LGBT culture
LGBT history
LGBT politics
LGBT youth
lgbti health summit
LGBTI Health Summit
libertarianism
Lifelube
Lisa Marie Presley
literary
Liza Minelli
LOGO
London
long term nonprogressors
Longtime Companion
Lord of the Rings
Los Angeles
Los Angeles Times
love
lube
Madonna
Magnet SF
Maine
malaria
Malaysia
ManAlive
Mandy Carter
Manhunt
marc felion
Marilyn Monroe
Marion Cotillard
Mark Snyder
Mark Wunderlich
Married Men
Martha Nussbaum
Martin Luther King Jr.
masculinity
Massachusetts
masturbation
Mattachine Society
Matthew Shepard
Medicine
mentorship
Meredith Vieira
methodology
Mexico
Michael Hurley
Michael Jackson
Michael Moore
Michael Petrelis
Michael Scarce
Michael Warner
Michel Foucault
Michelangelo Signorile
Michigan
Michigan Daily
Microsoft
Middle East
Mika
military
Million Dollar Bill
Minnesota
monogamy
moral panics
morality
Mormon Church
Moscow
Movable Type
Movimiento LGBTTT en México
MRSA
MTV
museveni
music
music videos
mythology
nair
NAMBLA
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force
National Sexuality Resource Center
NBC
Necto
needle exchange
Needles Jones
negative men
neo-nazi
neoliberalism
Netherlands
New York City
New York Times
New Zealand
newspapers
Newsweek
NGLTF
Nicole Kidman
No Doubt
North Carolina
Obama
obesity
okcupid
Olympics
Ongina
Oprah
oral sex
orgies
Original Plumbing
Out Magazine
Outfest
Outkast
Palestine
Pamela Conover
Pansy Division
parenting
Paris
Paris Hilton
Pat Califia
Pat Robertson
Patriot Act
Paul Newman
Peaches
Pedophilia
Perez Hilton
perfume
Peru
Peter Tatchell
pharmaceuticals
Philadelphia
Philippines
philosophy
photography
piercings
plagiarism
Planned Parenthood
pleasure
podcasting
poetry
police
police brutality
poppers
pornography
positional identity
Post exposure prophylaxis
post-race
postmodernism
Powell's
Poz Magazine
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis
PrEP
President Obama
Pride
Princeton
print media
Prison-industrial complex
progressive
Project Runway
Proposition 8
prospect theory
psychology
public health
public sex
Puebla
Puerto Rico
Queen Latifah
Queer as Folk
queer identity
queer politics
queer studies
queer theory
QueerToday.com
Question of the Day
Quotes from People's Profiles
Rachel Maddow
racialized desire
racism
Racism
Radical Faeries
radio
raid
Raleigh
Rape
recording industry
rectal microbicides
refreshing
religion
RENT
Rene Zellweger
reproductive health
Republican Bastards
Republican party
research
retreat
Richard Labonte
rimming
risky business
Rita Hayworth
Road Trip
Robert Novak
Robyn
Roe v. Wade
Rome
Romeo Void
Royal Oak
RuPaul
RussaYog
Russia
russian river
Saint Foucault
Salon.com
Sam Sparro
San Francisco
San Francisco AIDS Foundation
San Francisco State University
Sarah Palin
Sasha Baren Cohen
Saturday Night Live
Scarlet Johansson
School violence
Scissor Sisters
Scooter Libby
Scott's life
Search engines
Seattle
September 11th
seroadaptation
serosorting
Sex and the City
sex education
sex offenders
Sex Panic
sex work
sex-negativity
Sexism
sexology
SexPols
sexual ethics
sexual health
sexual scripting
Sexuality & LGBT Studies
Sexuality & LGBT Studies
SF Weekly
silver foxes
sissyphobia
Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
size queens
smoking
social justice
social marketing
social networking
social science
socialism
Sociology
Sordid Lives
South Africa
South America
South Park
Spain
spanish
sports
Starbucks
statistics
Steamworks
stem cells
stereotypes
stigma
stock market
Stonewall
stop AIDS
straight people
suburbia
Sue Hyde
superinfection
Supreme Court
Susan Kippax
Susan Stryker
Suzanne Pharr
Switzerland
syphilis
Taiwan
taso
technology
Ted White
Telephone
television
terrorism
Thailand
Thanksgiving
The Advocate
The Anonymous Gay Sex Column
The Bottom Monologues
The Gayest Podcast in Michigan
The L Word
The Netherlands
The Onion
the South
The Today Show
The Vatican
The View from the Bottom
The Village People
threesomes
Time Magazine
Tina Fey
Toe up
Tom DeLay
Tony Valenzuela
tops
Toronto
Transamerican Love Story
transgender
transphobia
tricks
Troy Wood
Tucker Carlson
Twilight Series
twinks
Twitter
uganda
Ugly Betty
UNC Chapel Hill
unemployment
Union Square
United Kingdom
United Nations
Unity Conference
University of Michigan
Urvashi Vaid
Utah
vacation
vaccine
Vagina Monologues
vaginas
Valentine's Day
vampires
Vermont
Veteran's Day
Viagra
Victoria Beckham
Village Voice
voting
Walmart
Washington DC
wax
Wendy Brown
Whitney Houston
Wicked
William Way
Wisconsin
women of color
Women's Studies
World Health Organization
Xtube
yoga
young gay men
youth
Youtube
Zimbabwe
zines
zoology
mile Durkheim