September 2008 Archives
Who Needs Punxsutawney Phil?By on September 30, 2008 4:31 PM | 2 Comments

I've been noticing this bizarre-looking animal creeping around my apartment ever since I returned to Ann Arbor in August. It reminded me at first of a giant rodent / beaver combination -- I was totally perplexed! What could this animal bee? Muskrat? No. Wolverine? Hell no. And then it finally hit me -- I was looking at a bonafide groundhog! I took this picture of the little feller today.
How bizarre! Growing up in North Carolina, my only concept of groundhogs was the famous Punxsutawney Phil, a Pennsylvanian groundhog known nationally for his alleged predictions of whether winter is soon to come to an end. Folks for some reason started believing that if he saw his shadow and was scared, there would another six more weeks of winter. If not, spring was soon to come. Weird.
The area around my apartment is home to a number of bizarre animals. A skunk lives very closeby -- I see him nosing around at night, and smell him even when I can't. I'm never quite sure if it's him, or my neighbors smoking themselves silly. The smells are eerily similar!
Miley Kicks Gays Out of Disney!By on September 30, 2008 11:24 AM | No Comments
Oh no she didn't! In a move that will surely have thousands of bronzed muscle marys up in arms, Miley Cyrus has decided to rent out Disneyland the same day as the usual annual "Gay Day" Celebration. That means the gays will have to go elsewhere to celebrate! Fuck you, Miley! What a nasty lady. Here's the word from Popnography:
We have to admit we were a bit shocked that Miley Cyrus would choose to have her sweet 16 party at Disneyland the same weekend that tens of thousands of gays are scheduled to descend upon the park for the annual Gay Days celebration. Sure, Miley is a bona fide diva-in-training and the 5,000 screaming teenage girls spending $250 each to attend the birthday party probably have similar tastes in music as most of the gays who would be cruising in the hour-long line for Space Mountain, but still, something just didn't added up. And we were right. It's now been announced that Disneyland will close early Saturday, October 5, for Miley's party and the gays will be forced to cavort else where for the evening. It just goes to show that no matter how far we think we've come, one 15-year-old with a live mic gets priority over 30,000 LGBT folks ready to spend their disposable incomes on $22 burgers and $46 rainbow-tinged mouse ears.
I have many friends who make the trek to Orlando each year for the circuit party that surrounds the weekend. I wonder if this will have an impact there? No word yet from the official party planners.
FOX News Debate Focus Group -- Pro-Obama!By on September 30, 2008 12:09 AM | No Comments
Stumbled across this little gem over at boy culture. FOX News (yes, that's right) got a group of undecided voters together to watch the debate and polls their reactions. Their verdict: Obama came out on top. Interesting stuff, particularly with their fancy poll-as-they-speak technology presented at the end:
(Via boy culture)
NC-Sen: Fire Liddy Dole!By on September 29, 2008 11:50 PM | No Comments
After all, she doesn't even live in North Carolina:
Dole's polling awfully these days, a sign that perhaps NC voters are coming around! I hope so! North Carolina -- my home state -- deserves much better than she could ever offer.
Here's brownsox @ DailyKos on the latest PPP polls from NC for Dole and for President:
Public Policy Polling. 9/27-28. Likely voters. MoE 4.5% (9/17-19 numbers)Hagan (D) 46 (46)
Dole (R) 38 (41)
Cole (R) 6 (6)Very impressive numbers for Hagan - the best she has shown all cycle, even after a series of impressive polls for the Democratic candidate.
PPP is known as a Dem-leaning pollster, though a generally reliable and trustworthy one. These results are also not out of line with PPP's previous polls in the state. We'll be waiting anxiously for confirmation of this poll.
If the poll is accurate, it's simply awful news for incumbent Elizabeth Dole. Polling at 38% is always terrible news for an incumbent, but it could be the kiss of death five weeks before the election.
The results are every bit as good in the presidential race, relative to previous numbers:
Public Policy Polling. 9/27-28. Likely voters. MoE 4.5% (9/17-19 numbers)
Obama (D) 47 (46)
McCain (R) 45 (46)Pretty much in line with prior PPP polling. This poll would appear to solidify the new conventional wisdom that North Carolina, with its 15 electoral votes, is too close to call at this point.
That's a remarkable statement, considering even Bill Clinton failed to win North Carolina in both campaigns. If this poll resembles his internals - and it dovetails with Pollster's recent trends - John McCain must be weeping.
(Video also via DailyKos)
Cafferty on Sarah PalinBy on September 29, 2008 5:53 PM | No Comments
"There's no excuse for that answer." Indeed:
(Via KnuckleCrack)
Aussie Researcher: Circumcision Protects Gay Tops from HIVBy on September 29, 2008 1:36 PM | 5 Comments

New research out fo the University of New South Wales in Australia supports what many HIV/AIDS researchers had suspected for years now: circumcision reduces the risk of contracting HIV for gay men who predominately "top" (e.g. are the insertive partner in anal sex). Obviously, this does not impact us bottoms.
Here's the news:
Sydney - Circumcision can help protect gay men from contracting the virus that causes HIV/AIDS, researchers in Australia have found. "We have shown for the first time that men who predominantly take on the insertive role in sex are less likely to contract HIV if they have been circumcised," David Templeton, from the University of New South Wales, told an international gathering in Perth.The Sydney-based researcher said his team studied 1,426 HIV-negative men, two-thirds of whom were circumcised, and tracked their HIV infection over four years.
While circumcision did not reduce the HIV risk overall, the study found men who predominantly took the insertive role had an 85-per-cent reduced risk of contracting HIV if they were circumcised.
Templeton warned against any notion that circumcision provided protection, noting that most HIV infections were contracted in the receptive role, not the insertive role.
Circumcision provides some protection because it removes the foreskin which is prone to lesions, which in allow the virus to enter the body through the penis.
Now the question is, do we want to sacrifice 1000s of nerve endings, better orgasms, and pleasure in the face of this data? I'm not so sure.
Quotes from People's Profiles: 1st EditionBy on September 29, 2008 11:24 AM | 2 Comments
And now I'd like to begin a series I'd like to call "Quotes from People's Profiles," where I bring to you some of the more outrageous, irritating, and downright nasty things queer men say in their online profiles. Today I'd like to begin with a rather classic example of fagbashing I stumbled upon while the sand was still fresh in my eye this AM:
Puzzle for you: If you line up all the guys in the world, remove all the straight ones, remove the ugly ones, remove the unintelligent ones, remove the feminine ones, remove the liars/cheaters, and finally remove the assholes...is there anyone left?
Now initially this may seem to be a bit innocuous. Just the usual ranting and raving about how everyone online is a lying this-and-that. But notice here that "feminine" is essentially equated with "liars/cheaters," "unintelligent," and "assholes." How charming! And that makes this asshole the prime first installation in "Quotes from Peoples Profiles." Happy Monday!
Three QuestionsBy on September 28, 2008 3:26 AM | 2 Comments
I had a lovely discussion today with two fellow Michigan graduate students tonight. One is from Paris and in the French department, the other is British and in the Philosophy department. Our long, outrageous conversation fell back on three central questions which I think all of my work is concerned with:
1) What power do we have over our own desires? Can we change them if we want to?
2) Is organizing around marginalized identities reinscribing our own subordination? (this related to Wendy Brown's argument in "Wounded Attachments")
3) If identity is no longer useful as a rubric for gay and lesbian organizing, then what model should replace it?
Any ideas? :)
1951?By on September 27, 2008 4:39 AM | 5 Comments
I was surfing around Myspace this evening/morning when I came across this:

Honestly!
By on September 26, 2008 5:53 PM | 1 Comment

So ever since my canoeing fun at the Russian River a few months back, I've been jonesin' to get back on the water for some lazy afternoon fun. So when Maxime and Pedro mentioned that they were jogging and looking for ways to enjoy the warm weather (while we've got it here), I suggested we try to rent a canoe on the Huron River for an afternoon. A quick Google search yielded information on the City of Ann Arbor's canoe liveries on the Huron River.
And that was that! We had a lovely time this past Wednesday lazily paddling along, enjoying some delicious Rose wine along the way. Loves it! Here's some photos for your viewing enjoyment:
Letterman's Top 10 Questions People are Asking McCainBy on September 25, 2008 11:37 AM | No Comments
Letterman skewers him!
10. I just contributed to your campaign - how do I get my money back?
9. Hi, this is Sarah Palin. Does this mean I'm Parsi'dent?
8. Can't you solve this by selling some of your homes?
7. Hi, this is Clay Aiken. Is McCain single?
6. Do you still think the fundamentals of our economy are strong, genius?
5. Are you doing all of this just to get out of going on Letterman?
4. What would Matlock do?
3. Hillary here, my schedule is free Friday night.
2. Is this just an excuse to catch up on napping?
1. This is President Bush, what's all this trouble with the economy?
Sorry for the sporadic posting this week. I'm SWAMPED with work and staying very busy. Will have photos soon from my lovely canoeing adventure down the Huron River with friends.
xoxoxo
Glenn Greenwald on the $700 Billion Bank BailoutBy on September 21, 2008 12:39 PM | 1 Comment

Many have chimed in on the outrageous trillion-dollar bailout of corporate America this past week, but Glenn Greenwald's analysis is brilliant:
What is more intrinsically corrupt than allowing people to engage in high-reward/no-risk capitalism -- where they reap tens of millions of dollars and more every year while their reckless gambles are paying off only to then have the Government shift their losses to the citizenry at large once their schemes collapse? We've retroactively created a win-only system where the wealthiest corporations and their shareholders are free to gamble for as long as they win and then force others who have no upside to pay for their losses. Watching Wall St. erupt with an orgy of celebration on Friday after it became clear the Government (i.e., you) would pay for their disaster was literally nauseating, as the very people who wreaked this havoc are now being rewarded.More amazingly, they're free to walk away without having to disgorge their gains; at worst, they're just "forced" to walk away without any further stake in the gamble. How can these bailouts not at least be categorically conditioned on the disgorgement of ill-gotten gains from those who are responsible? The mere fact that shareholders might lose their stake going forward doesn't resolve that concern; why should those who so fantastically profited from these schemes they couldn't support walk away with their gains? This is "redistribution of wealth" and "government takeover of industry" on the grandest scale imaginable -- the buzzphrases that have been thrown around for decades to represent all that is evil and bad in the world. That's all this is; it's not an "investment" by the Government in any real sense but just a magical transfer of losses away from those who are responsible for these losses to those who aren't.
I like to call it corporate welfare. These from the same fucking bastards who would sooner die than see a just and equitable welfare system be instituted -- you know, to help the POOR, rather than the ridiculously wealthy. It steams me the fuck up.
Cheney Smackdown: Must Preserve VP RecordsBy on September 20, 2008 6:42 PM | No Comments

Dick Cheney has been busy arguing for several years that the Office if the Vice President is not part of the Executive Branch of the United States Government, instead attached via the Constitution to Congress. This is fucking hogwash, and a glaring attempt to avoid having to turn over records of his activity while in office over to the National Archive when he leaves office -- as every Vice President has done before him. This is mandated by the Presidential Records Act, passed in 1978
Well a federal judge put the kibosh on that crap, ordering him to keep records from his office in order to turn them over when he leaves:
A federal judge on Saturday ordered Dick Cheney to preserve a wide range of the records from his time as vice president.Bernhard to Palin: "Don't You Touch my Old Testament, You Bitch!"The decision by U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly is a setback for the Bush administration in its effort to promote a narrow definition of materials that must be safeguarded under by the Presidential Records Act.
The Bush administration's legal position "heightens the court's concern" that some records may not be preserved, said the judge.
A private group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, is suing Cheney and the Executive Office of the President in an effort to ensure that no presidential records are destroyed or handled in a way that makes them unavailable to the public.
In a 22-page opinion, the judge revealed that in recent days, lawyers for the Bush administration balked at a proposed agreement between the two sides on how to proceed with the case.
Cheney and the other defendants in the case "were only willing to agree to a preservation order that tracked their narrowed interpretation" of the Presidential Records Act, wrote Kollar-Kotelly.
The administration, said the judge, wanted any court order on what records are at issue in the case to cover only the office of the vice president, not Cheney or the other defendants in the lawsuit.
The other defendants are the Executive Office of the President and the National Archives.
The lawsuit stems from Cheney's position that his office is not part of the executive branch of government.
This summer, Cheney chief of staff David Addington told Congress that the vice president belongs to neither the executive nor legislative branch of government but rather is attached by the Constitution to Congress. The vice president presides over the Senate.
The lawsuit alleges that the Bush administration's actions over the past 7½ years raise questions over whether the White House will turn over records created by Cheney and his staff to the National Archives in January.
By on September 20, 2008 6:38 PM | No Comments
Amazing:
Myth of the Day: Killing Praying Mantis is IllegalBy on September 20, 2008 6:21 PM | 1 Comment
Female Praying Mantis Devouring Male After Mating
My friend sent me an e-mail today saying that he had been traumatized upon being attacked today by a praying mantis. He killed the insect. I immediately thought, "hey isn't that illegal?" Where did the bizarre myth come from? God only knows. Most Americans apparently think it is -- but rest assured, killing praying mantis is not illegal. It never was, and never will be.
Just goes to show you: rumor and word-of-mouth can be EXTREMELY powerful!
"The Gay Men's Wellness Construct" @ GHMS, Oct 17-21st, SeattleBy on September 20, 2008 5:55 PM | 1 Comment
Exciting news from Seattle! I've been invited to speak on a panel at the opening plenary session of the 2008 Gay Men's Health Summit taking place next month in Seattle. How exciting! If you're not familiar, the Gay Men's Health Summit is a wonderful gathering of activist, organizers, thinkers, practitioners, and researchers all committed to improving gay, bisexual, transgender and queer men's health. This will be my first GMHS -- I've previously attended the National LGBT Health Summit in Philadelphia, which got me hooked on this group of fabulous activists.
I'll also be doing a workshop on my bottom research! Very exciting! Can't wait to get some initial feedback on my preliminary examinations of this data.
Registration is of course still open. Get up on it!
Here's a little promo:
Personality? "Bitchy." Mannerisms? "Masculine / Butch." Right.By on September 20, 2008 12:21 PM | 6 Comments

I love that gay men can unironically select those two boxes. Not that the two are necessarily contradictory, I suppose, but I mean the root of bitchy -- "bitch" -- is at root a gendered female noun. I think what's actually going on here is that sissies aren't willing to self-categorize as "Feminine," and instead I'd imagine the vast majority of Gay.com users ID as "Masculine / Butch." It's no fault of their own, really, but rather a gay culture that privileges masculinity on high while scrambling to conceal / cloak / disown femininity.
When guys ask me if I'm masculine in the first few minutes of an online conversation, I say goodbye. Because there's only one right answer -- no matter how much of a fag you are in real life. I'm not willing to play that game anymore.
Sigh.
Trans Woman Wins Discrimination Case Against Library of CongressBy on September 19, 2008 9:25 PM | No Comments
Great news out of Washington! Diane Schroer, an army veteran, has just won a discrimination case against the US Library of Congress! Wowzer! Here's CNN:
A former Army commander who underwent a sex change operation was discriminated against by the U.S. government, a federal judge ruled Friday in an important victory for transgenders claiming bias in the workplace.Diane Schroer won her federal lawsuit against the Library of Congress after officials backed out of a 2005 job offer when told of her intention to become a transsexual. At the time of the job interview for a position as a senior terrorism research analyst, David Schroer was a male. He had been a onetime Army Special Forces commander.
U.S. District Court Judge James Robinson said Schroer's civil rights were violated.
"The evidence established that the Library was enthusiastic about hiring David Schroer -- until she disclosed her transsexuality," Robinson wrote. "The Library revoked the offer when it learned that a man named David intended to become, legally, culturally and physically, a woman named Diane. This was discrimination 'because of ... sex.' "
The judge will later rule on what financial damages Schroer is due.
Here's a Youtube video featuring Diane made by the ACLU. Congratulations, Diane!!!!
Donate to Planned Parenthood in Honor of Sarah PalinBy on September 19, 2008 11:15 AM | No Comments

I just received this very ingenious e-mail from a friend of mine. Make a donation today to Planner Parenthood, and sent Vice Presidential Candidate Sarah Palin a note to let her know that it was made in her honor! How fabulous. Do note that this is a grassroots effort, not one promoted by Planned Parenthood. Here's the e-mail with instructions:
Instead of (in addition to?) us all sending around emails about how horrible Sarah Palin is, let's all make a donation to Planned Parenthood. In Sarah Palin's name. And here's the good part: when you make a donation to PP in her name, they'll send her a card telling her that the donation has been made in her honor. Here's the link to the Planned Parenthood website:https://secure.ga0.org/02/pp10000_inhonor
You'll need to fill in the address to let PP know where to send the "in Sarah Palin's honor" card. I suggest you use the address for the McCain campaign headquarters, which is:
McCain for President
1235 S. Clark Street
1st Floor
Arlington , VA 22202PS make sure you use that link above or choose the pulldown of Donate--Honorary or Memorial Donations, not the regular "Donate Online"
(Thanks Jackson / Natasha!)
Sarah Palin Refuses Subpoenas?!?!By on September 17, 2008 8:44 PM | No Comments

Fuck this bullshit. I'm so over this election cycle. The love affair with Palin is downright disgusting. It makes me want to move to Canada.
CNN Gay Making Out Fun!By on September 16, 2008 1:53 PM | No Comments
This is hilarious:
Loves it!
CDC: Disparities in HIV Seroconversion Between Black, White MSMBy on September 13, 2008 2:59 PM | No Comments

New data from the CDC indicates that -- while all men who have sex with men are still at a high risk for contracting HIV -- black versus white MSM are contracting the disease at different ages. It seems that black MSM who are seroconverting are doing so in their late teens and early twenties, while their white counterparts are contracting the disease in their 30s and 40s.
This is VERY important information, and should translate directly into targeted prevention approaches for the two communities. Research has already demonstrated that black MSM generally are not engaging in higher risk sexual behavior than white MSM. But I wonder if that data has an fluctuation by age group. That would be very important info in interpreting this new data.
The data on white older MSM I'm sure is in part due to condom fatigue, something I quickly discovered in my research this summer interviewing HIV-negative bottoms in San Francisco. The older guys in my study almost universally hated condoms, and weren't afraid to say so. They were sick of using them. For many of these guys, bottoming was a strategy to avoid having to use them themselves -- that is, to avoid having to put condoms on their own dicks. In this sense, bottoming was a safer sex strategy for many of the men I interviewed.
We need some qualitative, on the ground work, that really digs deep into the practices, norms, and cultures of these different communities, however, before we can really understand where these numbers are coming from.
Here's the New York Times:
An unusually detailed study of people newly infected with H.I.V. in the United States has confirmed that the majority of new cases occur among gay and bisexual men and that blacks are most at risk. But the data show that whites and blacks tend to be infected at different times in their lives with the virus that causes AIDS.Most new infections of white gay and bisexual men occur when the men are in their 30s and 40s, the study found, while black gay and bisexual men are more likely to be infected in their teens and 20s. The results were reported on Thursday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The C.D.C. reported last month that the study found that the virus was spreading faster in the United States than had been thought. In 2006, the study found, 56,300 people were newly infected with H.I.V. — 40 percent more than the agency’s previous estimate of roughly 40,000 new cases a year. The study was performed using new technology that allowed researchers to distinguish between new and older infections.
(Via Lifelube)
Dating EconomicsBy on September 13, 2008 11:46 AM | 11 Comments

So I was excited last night to make the trek down to Toledo, Ohio for a date with a cute boy I'd met online (Gay.com). We had been talking on the phone for a few weeks, and had been having some pretty great conversations. He seemed like a nice guy, successful job and all that. So he planned for us to hit up the Toledo Museum of Art (which is really, quite amazing) for their Friday night wine tasting at the Glass Pavilion, where they have free glass blowing demonstrations for visitors daily. I went last term with Maxime and was awed by the museum's wonderful collection -- and their free admission.
But the date started to go south fairly quickly. When we arrived at the Glass Pavilion, he ran into a friend of his, and began chatting with him without looking at or engaging me. Totally ignored. Ouch. That was pretty gross, and I knew in that moment that this wasn't going anywhere. But I trudged forward, determined to still enjoy the night however possible. The Sake tasting at the museum that night was, indeed, quite fun. I don't get to live this kind of yuppie life in Ann Arbor, where me and my friends are generally far too broke to venture out to such places.
When the time came to pay for "Sake to Me," I of course offered my $20 bill out of my pocket. It's just what one does, right? Before coming down, I had explained to him that I was extremely broke this month, and he had explained to me that he was raking in pretty darn good dough. He had done more than allude to me that he'd be paying for the evening. But he didn't argue when I handed him the money. He just took it. My heart sank a bit in that moment -- that was my drinking "fun" money for the rest of the weekend. But I didn't say anything. I could manage to get by this week without it.
Then onwards to dinner. He had planned to take me to this fancy Japanese place near his apartment, which was indeed pretty tasty. I had some Tuna Nigiri -- it felt terribly luxurious -- and a mixed seafood teriyaki plate, which was so-so. The conversation was generally good. Whatever. I mean I think we both knew at this point that we probably weren't interested in each other. But we made the most of it. But then the bill came. He picks up the tab, and I of course reach into my pocket, which is the moment when I expected him to protest. But not protestation came. I dug around, pulled out my credit card, and handed it over. Still no protestation. Fuck. Me. I couldn't afford this dinner. I mean, there's no way in HELL I could afford this dinner. This was the equivalent of a week's worth of food for my budget right now in graduate school.
The cards were taken away, and he asked the waiter to split the tab. I almost cried. What to do? He had never formally promised me to pay for the evening. But he knew I was fucking broke this month, living on summer funds that I received back in April until my first GSI paycheck arrived late this month. He had planned the evening, choosing the restaurant according to his own economic sensibilities. He knew I couldn't afford these things. Or did he? In retrospect, perhaps that this was just another night out for him. Maybe -- to him -- It wasn't all that expensive or luxurious. It was just that Japanese place that was a few doors down from his apartment, and a trip to the free art museum. But -- of course -- to me, it was a whole LOT of money.
Perhaps I could feel better about this situation if we really hit it off -- if he was an incredible guy and I was just so enamored with the evening. But it was a total bust. So now I feel like I'm out several gallons of gas, a potential Friday night with my friends, and a week's worth of food-money.
This seems to me to be a problem experienced by many couples where each partner is from a different class background. What's cheap to you, is outrageously expensive to me. It wrecks havoc on relationships.
Well, at leasmot there's no relationship to wreck havoc on for me. Ramen noodles, here I come!
Diane Keaton: "What's up, bitches?"By on September 11, 2008 11:57 AM | No Comments

This review from Diane Keaton for the forthcoming movie, The Women (which she is not in, strangely), is AMAZING:
What's up, bitches? Diane Keaton here. I just got back from seeing The Women and, um, I couldn't help but notice something: I AM NOT IN THIS MOVIE. Where the fuck am I? I am the queen bee of this shit. The hive mother. Annette Bening wishes she could smile through her tears like Diane Keaton! You know the Meg Ryan character? The one who spent her whole life trying to be everything to everybody but somehow somebody is always disappointed? That's like if my entire oeuvre mated with itself and gave birth to a mega-me. I'm sure you remember when Meg Ryan says, "Wouldn't it be great if when you were born, they gave you a rule book?" I am, like, ALWAYS saying that! I should have mailed that shit to myself. Then there's the Jada Pinkett Smith lesbian ("If we're lost, we both ask for directions"). I could SO play that character. I invented lesbians. Look it up. And the little girl who makes a tiny bonfire of tampons because she's just not ready to become a woman? Did you even THINK of casting Diane Keaton in that role? No? Big. Fucking. Mistake. I can play young. Hey, Hollywood. Write this down. Next time you make a two-hour vaginal suppository that hasn't met a feminine cliché it didn't dip in chocolate and shove down America's gullet (smoking, shopping, cheating, faked orgasms, diets, supermodels, bubble baths, hunger, water breaking, Botox), maybe you should do your job and fucking call Diane Keaton. Bitches.
(Via Joe. My. God.)
"Hipster: The Dead End of Western Civilization"By on September 11, 2008 11:21 AM | No Comments

Adbusters has a *scathing* piece this month on hipster culture, citing is a "suicidal" and evidence of an American culture "lost in the superficiality of its past." It was when I moved to San Francisco in 2005 that I first got my taste of this thing called "hipster," a nebulous term indeed, but it generally seemed to be an attempt at ironic skewering of pop culture.
Unfortunately, in my experience, hipster "scenes" tend to reproduce all the nasty things that made them hate pop culture in the first place: exclusionary practices, pretention, and egomania. Most of them are the losers and nerds from high school (my people), intent on getting a piece of the popularity pie in college and beyond. But at some point along the way, they forget just how it awful it felt to be constantly looked down on in primary school, and wind up doing exactly the same thing to others. It's like bitchy gay boys. Same thing.
Now, this of course is not all hipsterfolk. There are many kind / generous / thoughful / intelligent / politically savvy people who would be labelled for style of dress as a "hipster." Many of my friends in SF might be categorized under that label (though of course they probably would not identify as such). And many of the most scenestery, pretentious hipster-looking boys and girls are probably incredibly wonderful people outside the scene, one-on-one. But the scene is awful. It kills. The beady-eyed, foamy-mouthed glee for outrageosly clever irony must end. Counter-culture, it is not.
Here's a few choice words from Adbusters:
An artificial appropriation of different styles from different eras, the hipster represents the end of Western civilization – a culture lost in the superficiality of its past and unable to create any new meaning. Not only is it unsustainable, it is suicidal. While previous youth movements have challenged the dysfunction and decadence of their elders, today we have the “hipster” – a youth subculture that mirrors the doomed shallowness of mainstream society.[snip]
The American Apparel V-neck shirt, Pabst Blue Ribbon beer and Parliament cigarettes are symbols and icons of working or revolutionary classes that have been appropriated by hipsterdom and drained of meaning. Ten years ago, a man wearing a plain V-neck tee and drinking a Pabst would never be accused of being a trend-follower. But in 2008, such things have become shameless clichés of a class of individuals that seek to escape their own wealth and privilege by immersing themselves in the aesthetic of the working class.
This obsession with “street-cred” reaches its apex of absurdity as hipsters have recently and wholeheartedly adopted the fixed-gear bike as the only acceptable form of transportation – only to have brakes installed on a piece of machinery that is defined by its lack thereof.
Lovers of apathy and irony, hipsters are connected through a global network of blogs and shops that push forth a global vision of fashion-informed aesthetics. Loosely associated with some form of creative output, they attend art parties, take lo-fi pictures with analog cameras, ride their bikes to night clubs and sweat it up at nouveau disco-coke parties. The hipster tends to religiously blog about their daily exploits, usually while leafing through generation-defining magazines like Vice, Another Magazine and Wallpaper. This cursory and stylized lifestyle has made the hipster almost universally loathed.
(Via KnuckleCrack)
Infertility: Not Just for Women Anymore!By on September 9, 2008 1:07 PM | No Comments
Time Magazine has a report on several new studies that indicates men experience a loss of fertility as they age -- just like women do -- and that older paternal age is associated with risks such as bipolar disorder. This of course flies in the face of common attitudes towards fertility that see infertility primarily as a woman's problem. Apparently as much as a 50% of infertility may be due to men, not women:
Not only do men become less fecund as they age, but their fertility begins to decline relatively early — around age 24, six years or so before women's. Historically, infertility has been seen as a female issue, as has the increased risk of Down syndrome and other birth defects, but studies now also link higher rates of autism, schizophrenia and Down syndrome in children born to older fathers. A recent paper by researchers at Sweden's Karolinska Institute found that the risk of bipolar disorder in children increased with paternal age, particularly in children born to men age 55 or older.It used to be that "if you had hair on your chest, it was your wife's problem," says Barry Behr, an associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the Stanford Medical School and director of Stanford's in vitro fertilization laboratory. Even now, he said, though about half of infertility cases are caused by male factors, such as low sperm count or motility, there are many more tests to evaluate a woman's fertility than a man's.
You can find the Swedish study on bipolar disorder here, and the French study on age and pregnancy rates here.
And PS: isn't that photo of a microscope sold in Japan AMAZING? Thanks to Gizmodo for that. Notice not just the happy sperm, but also the DEAD sperm on the box. How amazing!
UK Teacher Drunkenly Bets on Living on £1 / Day, for 1 Year. And Wins!By on September 8, 2008 10:30 AM | No Comments

Pretty damn amazing! Living on one pound is theoretically the equivalent of two American dollars, but really the numerical prices are just about the same in the UK as they are here. That is to say, a sandwich here might cost $5 -- but in the UK it would cost £5 (or $10, at the exchange rate). So £1 is not a lot of money. But she did it. Here's the Daily Mail:
Anyone finding it hard to cope with the credit crunch will find little sympathy from teacher Kath Kelly.The cash-strapped teacher had an alcohol-induced wager with friends that she could beat the credit crunch by living on just £1 a day for a whole year - and won.
Miss Kelly, 47, ate at free buffets, shopped at jumble sales and scavenged food discarded by grocery stores and restaurants.
[snip]
She picked fruit from bushes and trees and collected £117 in loose change dropped in the street - a third of her annual budget.
She even managed a free trip to France by hitchhiking through the Channel Tunnel.
And to cap it all, she found love while working as a volunteer on an organic farm during the holidays.
Miss Kelly was sharing a house in Hotwells, Bristol, when she complained to her friends over a few glasses of wine that she could not afford a wedding present for her brother Danny.
She boldly announced that she would survive on £1 a day for the 12 months up to the wedding.
Kath Kelly'I woke up the following morning and instantly regretted it but it was too late - I'd told my friends and now I had to go through with it.'
With her rent and utility bills already paid for the year, her budget had to cover transport, food, clothes and socialising.
She soon learned to spot a bargain and after working at the English Language Centre in Clifton, where she teaches for 20 hours a week, she regularly visited super-markets and butchers at closing time to buy reduced food.
She added: 'I had a freezer full of stuff. I was out all the time with a bag on my back and if I saw bread for 10p at the end of the day, or reduced vegetables - anything - I bought it.'
Miss Kelly would hunt down market researchers in the street as they often have samples to give away.
Incredible!
Tokio Hotel = Most Fistable Twinks EverBy on September 7, 2008 11:51 PM | No Comments

PS Re: the VMAs last night, Germany's best new artist-winning boy-group, "Tokio Hotel," is perhaps the most fistable group of twinks I've seen on stage at an awards show in years! Rawr. Makes me wanna go get my elbow grease! ;) Notice that the lead singer and guitarist are twin brothers. That's right, the hippie-thug with the dreads and the beastly twinkalicious one. Done and done! I kind of secretly hope their career tanks and they wind up making silly German gay porn in a few years. I'd pay at least eight gay dollars to see that.
ITunes 8.0 to Include Pandora-like Playlist Generator?By on September 7, 2008 12:16 PM | No Comments

Tuesday will feature a big media event from Apple, with rumors circulating that a new iPod nano, Touch, and ITunes will be released. What interests me most -- much more than the iPod intros -- is the rumor that iTunes will come packaged with something called "Genius," which will choose songs that go well together. It's like Pandora, one of my favorite web apps in the world (which, btw, is rumored to be in trouble financially because of regulation issues). Here'sthe info tipped to Kevin Rose (founder of Digg):
Tunes 8 includes Genius, which makes playlists from songs in your library that go great together. Genius also includes Genius sidebar, which recommends music from the iTunes Store that you don't already have.
I LOVE this idea! I just recently formatted my computer and lost all my playlists (I backed up my music, but not the playlists, sadly). So I've been rebuilding slowly, but it's a difficult task to strike the right chord for whatever event. Genius looks to ease my pain! Can't wait!
"The Daily Show": The Best Political Analysis on TV?By on September 4, 2008 9:32 PM | 1 Comment
Jon Stewart on Sarah Palin, Karl Rove, sexism, and the Republican Party. Brilliant:
Study Refutes MMR Vaccine, Autism LinkBy on September 4, 2008 1:21 PM | 3 Comments
For many years now, there has been a mobilization against vaccinating small children based on shaky evidence of a link between the MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella) vaccine and autism. A new study out of Columbia University refutes that claim:
The theory was created in 1998, when British researcher Andrew Wakefield published studies that suggested the measles vaccine caused gastrointestinal problems and that those GI problems led to autism.W. Ian Lipkin of Columbia University in New York, who co-authored the most recent study, said Wakefield theorized that the virus used in the vaccine grew in the intestinal tract, leading to inflammation that made the bowel porous. That allowed material to seep from the bowel into the blood, Wakefield's theory surmised, affecting the nervous system and causing autism.
In Wednesday's study, the researchers replicated key parts of Wakefield's original study to determine whether the vaccine causes autism and GI problems, said Mady Hornig, a study co-author. Irish pathologist John O'Leary, co-author of Wakefield's studies that supported the autism link, also is a co-author of the new study.
O'Leary and the other researchers looked for evidence of the measles vaccine in children's intestines after they had been vaccinated and sought to determine whether their GI problems and autism symptoms occurred before or after they were vaccinated.
They analyzed samples taken from 38 children with bowel disorders, 25 of whom also had autism. The investigators found only one child in each group had trace amounts of the measles virus in their samples.
The samples were analyzed at Columbia and at a laboratory of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as at O'Leary's lab -- the same one Wakefield used for his original studies.
The conclusion: "no evidence" linked the vaccine to either autism or GI disorders, Lipkin said.
Now hopefully we can have some sanity on this issue. Autism as you may know is a politically hot issue, with various celebrities lobbying (Jenny McCarthy, etc) for more awareness. Unfortunately, the guidelines for diagnosing autism have been expanding, so it's perhaps no wonder that more children have been diagnosed in the past 20 years. I find it somewhat similar to ADD (attention deficit disorder), an extremely vague and every-expanding category of "disease" that parents have rushed to treat with drugs not terribly different from cocaine. It's effectively the medicalization of our young people, and it makes me deeply uncomfortable.
"Milk" Trailer!By on September 3, 2008 5:56 PM | 2 Comments
So exciting! Here's the trailer for Gus Van Sant's upcoming biopic on San Francisco gay rights pioneer Harvey Milk. He was shot to death in 1978 -- along with SF Mayor George Moscone -- by recently resigned SF Supervisor Dan White. At the trial for the murder, White cited his consumption of junk food as evidence for the depression he claimed led him to commit the murders (this later became known as the "Twinkie Defense"). He was sentenced to only seven years in prison. He served five years, was paroled, and went on to commit suicide two years later. Oy.
I Dream of Identity PoliticsBy on September 3, 2008 8:50 AM | No Comments
A bit of rambling this morning.
First, can I just say, God bless I need a life! You know you're a graduate student when you wake up from a dream in which you were sitting in a seminar discussing the ins and outs of sexual identity politics. I believe I was embarrassed because I made a bit of an anti-queer gaffe, talking about gay and lesbian identities and sarcastically saying, "as if there were any other options?" I believe this is all coming from a review I've been writing for Culture, Health, and Sexuality, where I do a bit of bashing of "queer theory."
The other half of the dream? I was in France with friends, headed to Nice on a train that was as wide as a freighter. It was a giant complex, with various restaurants, bars, and shops. If only it were true! I've been a bit anti-tourism lately, feeling a bit confused about why people travel 1000s of miles and spend 1000s of dollars to have experiences relatively similar to their own at home -- and experiences that (in almost all cases) do not resemble those of the people who live there. I was chatting the other day with my British friend Nat about this very phenomenon, and we decided that it a murky issue ethically, but that knowing a local and having them as an entree into the culture could make for a more meaningful experience. In the dream, I was headed to Nice with my friend Maxime, who is from France and was going to show me around.
Sigh. Now to start my day. First, a meeting for my graduate student instructorship (GSI) orientation class. Some of you may be more familiar with the "teaching assistant (TA)" terminology, but grad students are unionized here at Michigan so we fought for a more PC term. From there I go to the Women's Studies Welcome luncheon, where I will present with my friend Mira the schedule for monthly happy hours that we spent last night carefully designing. Then on to a very ominous sounding meeting with the chairs of Sociology and Women's Studies, all the joint SOC/WOMST grads, the current graduate program director, and all the previous program directors. Eesh. I hope we leave with an official graduate program to refer to still.
Daniel Radcliffe, is that you?By on September 2, 2008 3:50 PM | No Comments

Holy canoli! Daniel graces the October cover of GQ Mag. His hotness has been steadily climbing since those sexy horse photos for Equus. Twinkalicious!
(Almost) Saw Barack ObamaBy on September 2, 2008 10:14 AM | No Comments

A bit too early for me!
Me and my dear friend Nat woke up at the crack of dawn yesterday to make the trek to Detroit for Barack Obama's scheduled Labor Day rally in Hart Plaza downtown. He was scheduled to take the stage at 11:00 AM, so we figured we would arrive when the gates opened at 8:30 AM. Traffic was congested because of Detroit's Labor Day parade that morning, so we didn't make it to the plaza until 9 AM. Not too shabby, we thought. We were wrong!
We tried to find the end of the line, which snaked for miles around buildings downtown. We heard a rumor that it snaked for six miles through downtown Detroit, with well over 100,000 people waiting to see Obama. Holy shit! I had never seen that many people in my entire life. Ever. Not even close. It was nuts. We slowly moved forward for the next two hours, hoping that maybe, somehow, we'd make it inside the ampitheatre. At about 11:00 AM, suddenly the line began to disperse, and we looked around confused. It was over. The jumbotron outside the Plaza had been turned on, and everyone made a beeline for the area in front of the screen.
We were so disappointed! We had traveled so far, and waited for so long! Nat was hoping to get a glimpse of the first Black US President, something he's quite excited about (even as a British citizen!). Anywho, I was disgruntled and refused to stand in the sunshine to watch a jumbotron, especially as I was starving and ridiculously thirsty. So we made our way over to the food stands set up for Detroit's Labor Day Parade, and I got myself a corn dog and some fries. Delicious!!!!
At that point, someone was shoutting to their friend that Barack's speech was being broadcast live at one of the stages near my corndog-eating-face. So Nat and I hurried over to hear (where we could also sit), but we surprised when the speech ended soon after it began. Nine minutes! That's all we got. Lame. He didn't say much of anything interesting, only that he had to cut things short because of Hurricane Gustav. Whatever, dude. Perhaps as many as 200,000 people waited in line for hours to hear you speak, and that's all we get? Hmph. I'm a little grumpy about it, clearly. Thankfully I wasn't one of the people who woke up at 4 AM to get in line at 5 AM. I would have been REALLY pissed.
Anycrankygay, it won't deter me from voting for Mr. Obama. But it certainly was disappointing! Oh well.
Nat waiting in line. You can see the line snaking around in the background.![]()

Detroit's "People Mover" (which only goes in one direction) running above the long, loopy line.![]()

The line made all kinds of crazy turns in front of the Cobo Center![]()

An unintentionally funny photo of Nat.![]()

Notice the cute boy with the "I'll sing you a song for $1" sign![]()









